Dataset

Kimi K3.1 Pro Model Card Data: Parameters, Benchmarks, and Pricing

Structured data for Moonshot AI's Kimi K3.1 Pro (Oct 24, 2026): 2.8T-param MoE (104B active/token), 1M context, multimodal, API 13/68 CNY per M tokens, weights by Nov 4, 2026.

One-sentence summary

This page aggregates structured data for Moonshot AI's flagship Kimi K3.1 Pro, released October 24, 2026: architecture, context window, input modalities, public benchmark scores, API pricing, and the open-weight plan, all as of October 24, 2026.

Data Description ​

Sources: Moonshot AI official releases (Kimi website, Kimi API platform documentation, Kimi K3 tech blog), a Wall Street Journal-style report by Wall Street CN dated October 24, 2026, and AIToolsRecap's October 24, 2026 summary citing Artificial Analysis. Definitions: total parameters are reported as 2.8 trillion (the vendor's phrasing is "3-trillion-class"); active parameters are 104 billion per token; prices are per million tokens, in CNY per Wall Street CN and in USD per AIToolsRecap citing Artificial Analysis; benchmark scores are official or reported raw values without conversion.

Core Data ​

fieldfield meaningvalue / notes
model_nameModel nameKimi K3.1 Pro (variant: Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed)
release_dateRelease date2026-10-24
total_paramsTotal parameters2.8 trillion (vendor: "3-trillion-class")
active_paramsActive parameters per token104 billion (~104B)
architectureArchitectureMixture of Experts (MoE) on Kimi Delta Attention (KDA) and Attention Residuals
context_lengthContext window1,000,000 tokens
input_modalitiesInput modalitiesText, image, video
output_modalitiesOutput modalitiesText
weight_open_dateOpen-weight planBefore 2026-11-04
access_channelsAccess channelsKimi web, App, Kimi Work, Kimi Code, Kimi API
benchmarkmetric notescore
Terminal-Bench 4.0Agentic terminal programming65.7%
Kimi Code Bench 3.0 Long-horizonInternal benchmark, long-horizon engineering61.2% (K3 was 55.95%)
BenchCAD (w/ tools)CAD code 3D reconstruction92.7%
OfficeQA Pro v2Financial document analysis64.4 (vendor claims SoTA)
Frontier FinanceFinance research58.6
Agents' Last ExamAgent capability43.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Full w/ tools)Broad knowledge79.0
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1Scientific terminal tasks68.1
GDPVal-AA v2.1General agent Elo1784.9
OSWorld V2.1Computer-use agent81.8
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis intelligence index55 (4th among public models)
price_itembilling item (per million tokens)CNYUSD
input_missInput (cache miss)13 CNY$2
input_hitInput (cache hit)1.3 CNY$0.20
outputOutput68 CNY$10
highspeed_multiplierHighspeed variant price2x standard2x standard
fact_itemfactuality / safety metricvalue / notes
hallucination_rateKimi Hallu Bench Hard single-fact error rate8.3% (K3: 23.4%)
xdev_hard_afterxdev-bench-hard (after cyber data removal)81.0%
xdev_hard_beforexdev-bench-hard (before removal)90.5%
internal_fin_modelInternal financial modeling gain vs K3~14%
internal_fin_researchInternal finance research gain vs K3~20%

Field Notes ​

model_name/weight_open_date: the weight release is planned and subject to final license terms. architecture: KDA and Attention Residuals are Moonshot AI's in-house components; KDA is a hybrid linear attention mechanism. Benchmark caliber: Kimi Code Bench series is an internal benchmark; on Terminal-Bench 4.0, Moonshot reports 65.7% for K3.1 Pro, 58.2% for GPT-6 Astra, and 66.4% for Claude Opus 5.5; on BenchCAD w/ tools, Claude Opus 5.5 scores 96.2% and GPT-6 Astra 95.9%. price_item: USD figures come from AIToolsRecap citing Artificial Analysis ($2 input, $10 output, $0.20 cache hit); CNY figures come from Wall Street CN (13 CNY input miss, 1.3 CNY input hit, 68 CNY output); the two sets describe the same pricing scheme. hallucination_rate is Moonshot AI's internal stress-test data, which the company notes uses deliberately hard scenarios and does not represent overall daily error rates.

Data Sources and References ​