Compare

Common robots.txt AI Opt-Out vs Google-Extended vs Per-Vendor Crawler Blocking

Compares three ways to opt out of AI training: the four-vendor robots.txt signal agreed October 30, Google's Google-Extended since 2023, and per-vendor crawler blocking.

One-sentence summary

Compares three ways to opt out of AI training: the new four-vendor robots.txt signal, Google-Extended, and per-vendor crawler blocking, across vendor coverage, timing and maintenance cost.

What Is Compared ​

  • Common robots.txt signal: A shared policy label agreed October 30, 2026 by OpenAI, Google, Microsoft and Anthropic, discussed at an IETF group.
  • Google-Extended: Google's crawler control since 2023 to exclude Gemini training.
  • Per-vendor crawler blocking: Disallowing each AI vendor's separate crawler name in robots.txt.

Key Parameters ​

DimensionCommon robots.txt signalGoogle-ExtendedPer-vendor blocking
Vendor coverageOpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Anthropic (phased)Google onlyAs configured
AvailabilityAnthropic live; Google/Microsoft 2027; OpenAI monthsSince 2023Immediate
MaintenanceOne ruleOne ruleGrows with vendor count
Search displayDoes not affect Bing resultsAllowed content may enter GeminiMay affect indexing
Standards statusUnder IETF discussionVendor-specificDe-facto practice
MetaSupports but not committed—Needs separate config

Key Differences ​

The unified signal covers multiple vendors with one config, but since the four are not live simultaneously, Google-Extended and other per-vendor rules remain short term. Per-vendor blocking works immediately but requires tracking new crawler names, raising maintenance cost.

Sources ​