Compare

ISO/IEC 27090 vs 27091: AI Security Threats vs Privacy Standards

Compare ISO/IEC 27090:2026 (security threats and compromises to AI systems) with ISO/IEC FDIS 27091 (AI privacy protection) on scope, status, audience and compliance use.

One-sentence summary

ISO/IEC 27090:2026 addresses security threats to AI systems and responses when compromised, already published; ISO/IEC 27091 covers AI privacy protection at the Final Draft (FDIS) stage — one for security, one for privacy, used together.

Standards ​

  • ISO/IEC 27090:2026: Cybersecurity — AI — Addressing security threats and compromises to AI systems; published October 2026 (Edition 1).
  • ISO/IEC FDIS 27091: Cybersecurity and Privacy — AI — Privacy protection; Final Draft International Standard.

Key Parameters ​

DimensionISO/IEC 27090:2026ISO/IEC FDIS 27091
TopicSecurity threats and compromises to AI systemsPrivacy protection in AI
StatusPublished (2026-10, Edition 1)FDIS final draft stage
AreaICS 35.030 (IT security)Cybersecurity and privacy
PriceCHF 204Not announced
FocusThreat detection, intrusion, model tamperingPersonal data processing and privacy risk

Key Differences ​

  • Angle: 27090 answers how to respond when AI systems are attacked, breached or tampered; 27091 answers how to protect privacy when AI processes personal data.
  • Maturity: 27090 is a citable published international standard; 27091 is still FDIS — enterprises can align early but should track the final text.
  • Use case: Security engineering and red teams can cite 27090; data-protection compliance and privacy impact assessments can follow the 27091 direction.

Guidance (Compliance View) ​

  • AI system security: use 27090 as the baseline for threats and response.
  • Data protection and privacy assessment: track 27091 final and pre-assess against the FDIS framework.
  • Use both in parallel to cover the security and privacy compliance lines.

Sources ​