Compare

Kimi K3 vs K3.1 Pro: Two Generations of Moonshot AI Flagships Compared

Compares Kimi K3 vs K3.1 Pro: same 2.8T MoE and 1M-token context; K3 weights open (Jul 2026), K3.1 Pro planned by Nov 4, 2026, adding Highspeed and stronger coding/3D/finance.

One-sentence summary

Kimi K3 and K3.1 Pro are both 2.8-trillion-parameter MoE flagships from Moonshot AI: K3's weights opened in July 2026, while K3.1 Pro (released October 24, 2026) is a post-training upgrade with weights planned before November 4, 2026 and a Highspeed variant running 2-3x faster.

Model Introductions ​

Kimi K3 is the previous-generation flagship released by Moonshot AI on July 27, 2026. With 2.8 trillion parameters built on Kimi Delta Attention (KDA) and Attention Residuals, it is the world's first open 3T-class model. Moonshot AI says Kimi models held the open-model size ceiling in 9 of the past 12 months (July 2025 to July 2026).

Kimi K3.1 Pro, released October 24, 2026, is the first model of the K3 series, a post-training upgrade of K3 focused on long-horizon coding, 3D modeling and spatial reasoning, finance research, and long-horizon agent execution. A Highspeed variant was announced the same day.

Core Parameter Comparison ​

DimensionKimi K3Kimi K3.1 Pro
Release2026-07-27 (K3 Open Day)2026-10-24
Total parameters2.8 trillion2.8 trillion (vendor: "3-trillion-class")
Active parameters per token104 billion104 billion
ArchitectureKDA + Attention Residuals; Stable LatentMoE (16 of 896 experts active)Inherits K3 architecture; post-training with RL, long-context reasoning, task scheduling
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Input modalitiesText, image, videoText, image, video
Weight statusOpen (2026-07-27)Planned before 2026-11-04
VariantsNoneK3.1 Pro Highspeed (~2-3x output speed, 2x price)
Coding benchmarksFrontierSWE 81.2; ProgramBench 77.8; SWE Marathon 42.0; Terminal Bench 2.1 88.3Terminal-Bench 4.0 65.7; Kimi Code Bench 3.0 Long-horizon 61.2 (internal)
3D / financeGeneral-purpose focusBenchCAD (w/ tools) 92.7; OfficeQA Pro v2 64.4 (vendor claims SoTA); Frontier Finance 58.6
API accessRecharge-gated on open platform (min CNY 10)Kimi web, App, Kimi Work, Kimi Code, Kimi API
Fact error rate (internal stress test)23.4% (Kimi Hallu Bench Hard single-fact)8.3%

Key Differences ​

Positioning and Training Route ​

K3 emphasized "open frontier intelligence," open-sourcing a 3T-class model and publishing KDA, Attention Residuals, and Stable LatentMoE details with its tech report. K3.1 Pro's upgrade is not about scale (same 2.8T) but about converting larger reinforcement-learning investment into sustained execution on complex tasks. Moonshot AI reports internal financial modeling up ~14%, finance research up ~20%, and business operations around 4.2x vs K3.

Benchmark Results ​

K3's public coding numbers include FrontierSWE 81.2, ProgramBench 77.8, Terminal Bench 2.1 88.3, and SWE Marathon 42.0 (kimi.ai tech blog, updated October 9, 2026). K3.1 Pro scored 65.7% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, above GPT-6 Astra's 58.2% and below Claude Opus 5.5's 66.4%; its internal Kimi Code Bench 3.0 Long-horizon is 61.2%, above K3's 55.95%. The two generations use different benchmark versions (Terminal-Bench 4.0 vs 2.1, Kimi Code Bench 3.0 vs 2.0), so cross-generation numbers are not directly equivalent.

Variants and Commercialization ​

K3.1 Pro adds the Highspeed variant (~2-3x output speed, 2x price, comparable intelligence) and the Kimi Hosted Agents managed-agent service. No equivalent high-speed variant was publicly reported for K3.

Open-Source Rhythm and Security Assessment ​

K3 weights are fully released. K3.1 Pro follows a "services first, weights later" plan, with full weights planned before November 4, 2026. Before opening, Moonshot AI disclosed it removed cyber attack-defense-related data from mid-training and RL stages; xdev-bench-hard dropped from 90.5% (before removal) to 81.0%.

Buying Guidance ​

Teams needing local deployment, fine-tuning, or weight-level research can use the already-open Kimi K3. API use cases needing stronger long-horizon coding, 3D, and finance can use K3.1 Pro (via API until weights open). For latency-sensitive production, evaluate K3.1 Pro Highspeed first. Both generations share the same context window and active parameters, so migration cost is mostly prompt adaptation and benchmark-caliber alignment.

Data Sources and References ​